Shigella spp. are nonmotile, non-spore forming gram negative bacilli that infect the intestinal tract of humans causing bacterial dysentery. Shigella spp. are transmitted from person to person via fecal-oral route either by direct physical contact, or indirectly by ingestion of food or water contaminated with human feces. Symptoms of Shigellosis include diarrhea, bloody stool, abdominal cramps, and fever. Typically the first sign of Shigellosis is profuse watery diarrhea due to the presence of enterotoxin. The blood and pus in the stool develop as a result of the invasion of Shigella spp into the mucosa of the colon. A variety of adhesins enable the Shigella spp. to come into contact with the intestinal mucosal cells. Once across the mucosa, Shigella spp. use invasins to enter the epithelial cells where they escape from the vacuole into the cytoplasm and multiply. They survive phagocytosis by inducing apoptosis in macrophages. Here is a video from the CDC with some general information on Shigella:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kufdtZzSn70
Shigella spp. are identified in the clinical microbiology laboratory by growth on MAC and XLD/HE agar, as well as biochemical tests such as KIA, LIA and Urea. Shigella does not ferment lactose and appears clear on MAC agar. Hektoen enteric agar (HE) is a higly selective media that primarily recovers Shigella and Salmonella spp., inhibits common colon flora, and contains indicators to detect hydrogen sulfide production. Shigella appears green without black centers on HE agar b/c it does not produce hydrogen sulfide. When Shigella grows on Xyline-lysine deoxycholate agar it appears red or clear b/c it does not ferment any of these carbohydrates.
Shigella KIA results are Alk/A, LIA results are P/Y, and Urea testing is negative.
KIA- organism ferments glucose, organism does not ferment lactose (Alk/A)
LIA- Pink/Yellow
Urea- Negative
Additional testing may be performed to determine the grouping of Shigella spp. by agglutination of specimen with antisera fro Groups A (S. dysenteriae), B (S. flexneri), C (S. boydii), and the most common D (S. sonnei).
See you next time!
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Sunday, June 26, 2011
Legionnaire's Disease
Legionnaire's disease is a febrile pneumonic illness with numerous clinical presentations. Legionella pneumophila, the etiologic agent of Legoinaire's disease most commonly identified, is a faintly staining, thin, gram negative rod that requires media supplemented with iron and L-cysteine.
Legionellae are found primarily in aquatic habitats and can infect and multiply within some species of free living amoeba, protozoa, or within biofilms. Legionella infections are acquired exclusively from environmental sources. Inhalations of infectious aerosols is considered the primary means of transmission. Following infection the organisms are taken up by alveolar macrophages where they survive and replicate, evading the hosts immune system. This link provides an animation of L. pneumophila entry into the macrophage.
Pneumonia is confirmed by chest x-ray or clinical diagnosis. The most commonly used laboratory test is the urine antigen test which detects Legionella bacteria in the urine specimen. A documented case of pneumonia and a positive urine test is diagnostic for legionnaire's disease. Diagnosis of legionnaire's disease can also be confirmed with isolation of Legionella pneumophila in culture from a lung biopsy, respiratory secretion, or from various other sites. In addition, paired sera that show an increase in antibody levels when drawn shortly after illness and several weeks following recovery can confirm diagnosis.
For you entertainment, I have added an additional link to a story about a suspected Legionnaire's outbreak at the playboy mansion. There is also a video link to an outbreak in a Miami hotel on the same page, in which there was one fatality.
Friday, June 17, 2011
Smoke and Mirrors
Day #1:
This week in lab we were given CSF samples that were plated on chocolate agar, SBA, and in thioglycolate broth. The source of the CSF was from a 19-year old male showing classic signs of meningitis. When I gram stained the CSF sample it was apparent that I had gram negative diplococci which led me to suspect Neisseria sp. The gram stain finding correlated well with the age and symptoms of my patient, considering Neisseria meningitidis is the most common cause of purulent meningitis in young adults. Unfortunately I was not able to make a definitive identification due to insufficient inoculation of the specimen used for the API NH...Lesson Learned!
This is what the API NH results looked like. Everything was negative! Ooops!
In addition we were given a urine sample plated on SBA, MAC and Chromagar. One day #1 I invested too much time on the significance of the turquoise colonies that appeared on my Chromagar. The organism that shows this colony morphology on Chromagar is Enterococcus.
But the confusion set in when I checked out my MAC agar...
It may be hard to tell by this picture but it appeared I had a NLF gram negative rod! Hmmmm, definitely wasn't the gram positive cocci Enterococcus. So after much confusion and and searching through flowcharts I set up an API 20E for definitive identification of my organism.
Day #2:
The next day when I arrived in lab I check out my MAC and Chromagar plates again. Things started to make more sense.
It was revealed that I had a slow WLF on MAC, which alleviated some of the confusion. And secondly, my colonies on Chromagar were metallic blue, suggestive of Citrobacter sp. It was starting to come together!
My suspicions were confirmed by the API 20E results. Phew! So, as Dr Greenup would say...it's time for reflection. My experience in lab this week taught me that when working with living organisms things may not always go by the book (or be what they seem). Identifying organisms is tricky. It takes patience, diligence, and experience!
Also I found a paper that summarizes clinical bacteriology quite well. It has some helpful flow charts that you may find useful when studying for your certification exam.
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/77/905/148.full
See you all next week!
This week in lab we were given CSF samples that were plated on chocolate agar, SBA, and in thioglycolate broth. The source of the CSF was from a 19-year old male showing classic signs of meningitis. When I gram stained the CSF sample it was apparent that I had gram negative diplococci which led me to suspect Neisseria sp. The gram stain finding correlated well with the age and symptoms of my patient, considering Neisseria meningitidis is the most common cause of purulent meningitis in young adults. Unfortunately I was not able to make a definitive identification due to insufficient inoculation of the specimen used for the API NH...Lesson Learned!
In addition we were given a urine sample plated on SBA, MAC and Chromagar. One day #1 I invested too much time on the significance of the turquoise colonies that appeared on my Chromagar. The organism that shows this colony morphology on Chromagar is Enterococcus.
But the confusion set in when I checked out my MAC agar...
It may be hard to tell by this picture but it appeared I had a NLF gram negative rod! Hmmmm, definitely wasn't the gram positive cocci Enterococcus. So after much confusion and and searching through flowcharts I set up an API 20E for definitive identification of my organism.
Day #2:
The next day when I arrived in lab I check out my MAC and Chromagar plates again. Things started to make more sense.
It was revealed that I had a slow WLF on MAC, which alleviated some of the confusion. And secondly, my colonies on Chromagar were metallic blue, suggestive of Citrobacter sp. It was starting to come together!
My suspicions were confirmed by the API 20E results. Phew! So, as Dr Greenup would say...it's time for reflection. My experience in lab this week taught me that when working with living organisms things may not always go by the book (or be what they seem). Identifying organisms is tricky. It takes patience, diligence, and experience!
Also I found a paper that summarizes clinical bacteriology quite well. It has some helpful flow charts that you may find useful when studying for your certification exam.
http://pmj.bmj.com/content/77/905/148.full
See you all next week!
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Urinary Tract Infections
Hello everyone! The topic of discussion in yesterdays lecture was urinary tract infections. I will begin my post by summarizing the types of UTI's and then post a link with more detailed information.
Bacteriuria is defined as the presence of bacteria in the urine. The source of the bacteria is most likely associated with a UTI, which can be divided further into asymptomatic, pyelonephritis, urethritis, cystitis, and acute urethral syndrome.
Bacteriuria is defined as the presence of bacteria in the urine. The source of the bacteria is most likely associated with a UTI, which can be divided further into asymptomatic, pyelonephritis, urethritis, cystitis, and acute urethral syndrome.
Type of Bacteriuria | Site of Infection | Symptoms |
Pyelonephritis | Upper UTI, kidney parenchyma, calyces, and pelvis | Vomiting, diarrhea, chills, increased heart rate, lower abdominal pain |
Cystitis | Lower UTI, Bladder | Dysuria, increased frequency, suprapubic tenderness, hematuria |
Urethritis | Lower UTI, Urethra, sexually transmitted | Frequency, dysuria |
Acute Urethral Syndrome | Lower UTI, primarily infection of sexually active women | Frequency, dysuria, urgency |
Predisposing factors that may lead to infection include compromised urine flow, alteration of pH and osmolarity due to hormones (pregnancy), high glucose concentrations, indwelling catheters, congential structural abnormalities, and immunosuppression. UTI's occurs most commonly in women due to shorter urethra, proximity of the urethra to the anus, and urethral contamination in sexual intercourse.
Routes of infection that lead to Upper UTI's are divided into ascending routes and hematogenous, or descending routes. The ascending route is the most common. The bacteria migrate from the bladder to the upper urinary tract. The descending route occurs through the migration of organisms from the blood to the kidney.
The most common pathogens of UTI's include E. Coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, S. saprophyticus, Poreus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeriginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus, and other Enterobacteriaceae species. The following table lists some common causes of UTI's and how they might be identified.
This link provide more detail about types of UTI's
Also, here is a link to a case study! You may have to copy and paste it into your address bar. Enjoy!
Friday, June 10, 2011
Meningitis
On Thursday in lecture we discussed CSF examination in Infectious Disease. Meningitis is characterized by inflammation of the membranes that cover the brain and spinal cord. It is divided into two categories: purulent and aseptic. Purulent meningitis is usually associated with bacterial infections and CSF examination revealing a large number of neutrophils. Aseptic meningitis is usually associated with viral infections and CSF examination revealing a large number of lymphocytes. The following table categorizes Purulent meningitis by age and condition and organisms commonly responsible for the infection.
Now we'll consider the following case history. See if you can identify the diagnosis and organism responsible for the infection in the following patient.
Case History:
A 38-year-old woman with no significant previous medical history came to the emergency department with a complaint of mild sore throat that had persisted for three days, accompanied by arthralgia, myalgia, and low-grade fever. The day before she had a severe headache with neck stiffness, nausea, and vomiting. Her white blood cell count was 21,800/mm3 with 67% polymorphonuclear leukocytes and 26% band cells. Platelet count was 200,000/mm3. Electrolyte levels were within normal range, and the glucose level was 131 mg/dL. A chest film showed no signs of pneumonia. A lumbar puncture revealed clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with a glucose level of 88 mg/dL and a total protein level of 33 mg/dL and no cells. Approximately 12 hours later, she became acutely lethargic and a second spinal tap was performed. The CSF appeared cloudy and now contained 871 white blood cells, of which 93% were polymorphonuclear leukocytes; the glucose level was 1 mg/dL; the total protein level, 417 mg/dL. Gram stain revealed rare gram-negative diplococci.
Age or Condition | Organism |
Neonates | S. agalactiae E. Coli Listeria GNB |
< 5 | N. meningitidis S. pneumoniae H. Influenzae (hib) |
Young Adult | N. meningitidis |
Adult | N. meningitidis S. pneumoniae |
Elderly | S. pneumoniae Listeria S. aureus GNB |
Aids Patients | Cryptococcus neoformans |
In addition medium sized, smooth, gray to white colonies grew on chocolate agar. To discover the diagnosis and identification of the organism visit the following link...
I hope you found this helpful!
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Streptococcus pneumoniae vs. Haemophilus influenzae
Before the battle begins I will brief you on my experience in lab this week...
It has been challenging trying to awaken my recollections of all of the information I learned in microbiology. Although it seems like yesterday, a year is just about enough time to forget all those little details. It's coming back to me now though. There were lots of bells ringing in lab this week.
It started yesterday when I received a blood culture bottle and case history for a 70 year old woman with multiple myeloma who was experiencing classic signs of a respiratory infection. I started off my investigation with a Gram Stain, but unfortunately nothing showed up. The only thing left to do was plate the blood culture out on chocolate agar and wait until the following day.
The following day and saw this!!!
Then I did a gram stain and saw this!!!
The presence of raised, umbilicate or flattened, gray colonies on the chocolate agar and gram positive lancet shaped diplococci on the gram stain directed my efforts to finding a confirmatory method for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. I performed a bile solubility test on two of the colonies. Bile solubility is performed to differentiate Streptococcus pneumoniae from other alpha-hemolytic species of streptococcus. S. pneumoniae undergoes autolysis when exposed to bile salts by lowering the surface tension between the medium and the bacterial cell membrane. After the addition of bile salts my colony had diminished, which is a positive finding for bile solubility and the identification of S. pneumoniae. That is when I did some additional research on S. pneumoniae to determine the clinical significance and happened upon the battle between S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.
Streptococcus pneumoniae vs. Haemophilus influenzae:
IN VITRO: S. pneumoniae overpowers H. influenzae by attacking it with hydrogen peroxide.
IN VIVO: H. influenzae is the only bacteria that survives when both are placed into the nasal cavity. That begs the question..."Why doesn't the hydrogen peroxide work for S. pneumoniae in vivo?" One of two hypotheses...The individuals immune system is triggered to attack S. pneumoniae when it attacks H. influenzae, or the presence of both species triggers a response that is not triggered by one species alone.
Interesting...for more information check out this link:
http://www.phschool.com/science/science_news/articles/bacterial_snitch.html
It has been challenging trying to awaken my recollections of all of the information I learned in microbiology. Although it seems like yesterday, a year is just about enough time to forget all those little details. It's coming back to me now though. There were lots of bells ringing in lab this week.
It started yesterday when I received a blood culture bottle and case history for a 70 year old woman with multiple myeloma who was experiencing classic signs of a respiratory infection. I started off my investigation with a Gram Stain, but unfortunately nothing showed up. The only thing left to do was plate the blood culture out on chocolate agar and wait until the following day.
The following day and saw this!!!
Then I did a gram stain and saw this!!!
The presence of raised, umbilicate or flattened, gray colonies on the chocolate agar and gram positive lancet shaped diplococci on the gram stain directed my efforts to finding a confirmatory method for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. I performed a bile solubility test on two of the colonies. Bile solubility is performed to differentiate Streptococcus pneumoniae from other alpha-hemolytic species of streptococcus. S. pneumoniae undergoes autolysis when exposed to bile salts by lowering the surface tension between the medium and the bacterial cell membrane. After the addition of bile salts my colony had diminished, which is a positive finding for bile solubility and the identification of S. pneumoniae. That is when I did some additional research on S. pneumoniae to determine the clinical significance and happened upon the battle between S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.
Streptococcus pneumoniae vs. Haemophilus influenzae:
IN VITRO: S. pneumoniae overpowers H. influenzae by attacking it with hydrogen peroxide.
IN VIVO: H. influenzae is the only bacteria that survives when both are placed into the nasal cavity. That begs the question..."Why doesn't the hydrogen peroxide work for S. pneumoniae in vivo?" One of two hypotheses...The individuals immune system is triggered to attack S. pneumoniae when it attacks H. influenzae, or the presence of both species triggers a response that is not triggered by one species alone.
Interesting...for more information check out this link:
http://www.phschool.com/science/science_news/articles/bacterial_snitch.html
Monday, June 6, 2011
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Infection Detection! For the next two months I will be taking an Infectious Disease course to fulfill curriculum requirements for the Clinical Laboratory Science program at UAB. As graduate students we are given an additional assignment in order to increase our understanding and knowledge of the subject. For the Infectious Disease course our assignment is to create a blog that catalogues topics covered in lecture and lab throughout the semester. Information will be posted twice a week and will include material covered in lecture and lab, something new that was learned, facts/data that was interesting, something that may have been unclear, and/or topics that I would like to know more about.
As a future medical laboratory scientist it will be my responsibility to identify and evaluate bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites associated with infectious disease. Journey with me throughout the educational process as I attain the knowledge and skills necessary to fulfill these responsibilities.
Thank you,
Stephanie Reynolds
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)